From the feedback - 12/04/01
Thursday April 12th 2001, Author: Sian Cowen, Location: United Kingdom
Anyone can join in with our From the Feedback features, all you have to do is click on the blue question link at the bottom of each article, or hit the My Feedback button at the top of every page. Tell us what you think, and don't feel you have to wait for us or someone else to get around to a topic. If something is steaming you up in your class, club or pub - let us know.
We'll be publishing the choicest moments from the stuff you send us - but each contribution may or may not be subjected to a rigorous process of editing for language, taste and imparted wisdom. And of course, as they so famously say at the start of anything like this, the opinions expressed in From the Feedback do not necessarily reflect those of the management, staff or investors of madfor sport.com. Instead, and much more importantly, they reflect your views.
Editor's plea. If you write to us, as hundreds of you do every week, and you want to see your thoughts in print, then please include your full name on your e-mail. Anonymous contributions will not be published.
Weight stacking must be legalised but the term "weight stacking" must be qualified. You only have to look at the ratio of deck beam max to water line beam on modern racing yachts to realise that the crew sit quite a distance outside the boat when hiking hard. I can't remember the numbers but I think if you run a VPP on a typical 40' one-design weighing circa 5/6000 KG an extra 80 KG person makes an improvement of about 15-20 seconds per mile (If a designer sees this he will probably shoot me down in flames - perhaps someone could qualify this statement? Stackable kit (and this needs defining to exclude liferafts, tables, floorboards, anchors etc.) should be anti-tamper sealed for National and other Grand Prix Events) and must be kept below at all times. We can't have a situation where a storm jib could be washed away or a liferaft comes hurtling down the rail injuring the crew. I won't mention any names but I know there were problems during the last Admiral's Cup where on the Sydney 40s upwind using the same sails some boats were able to grunt in to the chop a whole lot better than others. You can easily argue that there were different skill levels involved but I know the boats concerned and strongly suspect that boats were being "tidied" below after each tack. I do hope that this issue is addressed so that we can get on with racing One-Designs to expose our own skills and not worry about other people's (admittedly very few) integrity problems.
From Julian Bates
Weight stacking. Clearly there are sensible limits to what could potentially be movable but then you are back to the enforcement issue, especially in a cruiser-racer handicap class. Unless you have inspection of every boat before and after every race you will be back to square one. There are a number of areas already where we rely (perhaps naively) on honesty and fair play such as rounding offshore marks at night, not removing items which were onboard when the boat was weighed, not obtaining outside weather routing assistance, having the right sail measurements on the certificate etc. If someone is so desperate to win that they cynically cheat and can still feel good about themselves then perhaps they should go and find another sport as they are missing the point of what we do. On a more constructive note, I have two suggestions. Weight stacking should perhaps be allowed in IRM, as there is more chance that inspection could be practical in a "grand prix" context and therefore sensible controls over what can be moved could be enforced. Secondly, perhaps we could help enforce the current rules by making an explicit reference to the rule in our offshore racing crew declarations. Most people I meet in sailing do have a significant degree of integrity and honesty, especially if reminded, and if we encouraged crew to take more of a personal responsibility then we might be getting somewhere.
From Mike Ketley
Weight stacking. I have competed in three Fastnets and am about to compete in a fourth. In the last Fastnet we were third in IRC2. Whilst never having stacked sails or gear I have also never used an engine. The use of an engine is (at present) as difficult to police in an offshore race as the stacking of gear. A quiet night, just charging the batteries and creeping along a little bit faster than the opposition - who would know? I would, and hence would never do it. Our sport is essentially self-policing at the level of a Fastnet race (predominantly an amateur race) and our sport works solely because of the honesty of our competitors. If we start to accept that some people will start cheating by stacking sails then why bother going all the way up to the turning mark when no-one is looking, why not use the engine? The implied suggestion by the article that in some circles it is acceptable to stack sails and gear when the rules state that it is not also suggests that the scenarios I have outlined are acceptable. I think this is just a question of perception - to all of us using the engine is abhorrent, but stacking is not so obviously cheating. But it is cheating. There is a debate about stacking that perhaps should be had, but it is filled with difficulties as different boats benefit differently from stacking and how do you police people taking extra gear for heavy weather races purely for stacking? The RORC cannot be expected to weigh in every participant in the Fastnet (1,000 plus people).
From Christopher Butler
Weight stacking. I believe that in general weight stacking ought to be illegal. If it were legal, it would raise the bar even higher for racer/cruisers; yet something else the crew and owner need think of. It would also likely raise costs even more. As one of the previous writers noted, boats would start moving everything about. Eventually owners would claim that they have very thirsty crews such that they need 1000 kilos of drinking water. Hypothetically, when does weight stacking become water ballast? In Seattle, where I race most often, entrants are down for most races for precisely these sorts of reasons (stacking, no crew weight limits, issues over symmetrical/asymmetrical sails) - the bar is being raised too high. It is simply not fun any longer for the average weekend racer. I would hate to see what has occurred here also occur elsewhere. That said, I also believe that in grand prix classes, where gear is more tightly regulated, stacking is fine. The key is, of course, limiting what goes on the boat. But the regulation would have to cover everything - personal gear, etc. If not, every crew would then need at least two sets of gear for long races, as well as their own personal supply of water, etc. But, provided the regulations and inspections work and are consistent - no problem.
From Mike Ketley
Weight stacking. I have competed in three Fastnets and am about to compete in a fourth. In the last Fastnet we were third in IRC2. Whilst never having stacked sails or gear I have also never used an engine. The use of an engine is (at present) as difficult to police in an offshore race as the stacking of gear. A quiet night, just charging the batteries and creeping along a little bit faster than the opposition - who would know? I would, and hence would never do it. Our sport is essentially self-policing at the level of a Fastnet race (predominantly an amateur race) and our sport works solely because of the honesty of our competitors. If we start to accept that some people will start cheating by stacking sails then why bother going all the way up to the turning mark when no-one is looking, why not use the engine? The implied suggestion by the article that in some circles it is acceptable to stack sails and gear when the rules state that it is not also suggests that the scenarios I have outlined are acceptable. I think this is just a question of perception - to all of us using the engine is abhorrent, but stacking is not so obviously cheating. But it is cheating. There is a debate about stacking that perhaps should be had, but it is filled with difficulties as different boats benefit differently from stacking and how do you police people taking extra gear for heavy weather races purely for stacking? The RORC cannot be expected to weigh in every participant in the Fastnet (1,000 plus people).
From Christopher Butler
Weight stacking. I believe that in general weight stacking ought to be illegal. If it were legal, it would raise the bar even higher for racer/cruisers; yet something else the crew and owner need think of. It would also likely raise costs even more. As one of the previous writers noted, boats would start moving everything about. Eventually owners would claim that they have very thirsty crews such that they need 1000 kilos of drinking water. Hypothetically, when does weight stacking become water ballast? In Seattle, where I race most often, entrants are down for most races for precisely these sorts of reasons (stacking, no crew weight limits, issues over symmetrical/asymmetrical sails) - the bar is being raised too high. It is simply not fun any longer for the average weekend racer. I would hate to see what has occurred here also occur elsewhere. That said, I also believe that in grand prix classes, where gear is more tightly regulated, stacking is fine. The key is, of course, limiting what goes on the boat. But the regulation would have to cover everything - personal gear, etc. If not, every crew would then need at least two sets of gear for long races, as well as their own personal supply of water, etc. But, provided the regulations and inspections work and are consistent - no problem.
Latest Comments
Add a comment - Members log in